English عربي فارسی Русский TÜRKÇE
Arabic Farsi Russian Turkish

The Holocaust: Denial & History

barbed wire

The Nazi Holocaust claimed the lives of between 5 and 6 million Jews between 1939 and 1945. Since then, a small group of Holocaust deniers have lied about and minimized this history by deliberately manipulating historical evidence as part of an ideological and racist agenda.

Learning Tools: Myths & Facts

classroom

Holocaust deniers freely distort the historical record in order to justify anti-Semitism, racism and fascism. These tools help the novice and expert alike analyze denier claims and refute them with historical evidence including primary-source documents and both Nazi and survivor testimony.

Irving v. Lipstadt: Denial on Trial

gavel

In 1996 British Holocaust denier David Irving sued professor Deborah Lipstadt for alleged libel. Three courts found for Lipstadt concluding that Irving was a Holocaust denier, an anti-Semite and a racist. The unedited trial documents found below document this important victory for truth and history.

Continuing Effort: News & Updates

clippings

Holocaust denial suffered a sharp blow as a result of the Irving v. Lipstadt trial, however deniers and so-called "revisionists" continue to publicize their ideologically skewed version of history. We provide up-to-date news, links and resources on denial and its continued impact on culture.

Holocaust Denial in the News

XML

 

The links below demonstrate the ongoing struggle over the history and memory of the Holocaust. They appear based on keyword searches of current news articles and are neither selected nor endorsed by HDOT.


The Times of Israel

Holocaust denier David Irving leads tour of WWII sites
The Times of Israel
Irving lost a 1996 libel suit against historian Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books, for her depiction of him as a Holocaust denier in her book “Denying the Holocaust.” The four-year legal battle is set to become a Hollywood movie, with ...
Holocaust denier David Irving: 'I'm not an anti-Semite, yet'Jerusalem Post Israel News
Holocaust Denier David Irving Spurs Outrage Over Concentration Camp ToursAlgemeiner
Deborah E. Lipstadt to speak at 2015 Annual MeetingJewish United Fund

all 8 news articles »

Daily Mail

Holocaust denier David Irving organisess tours of concentration camps
Daily Mail
Irving, 77, is notorious for his attempts to play down the extent of the Holocaust, and his insistence that Hitler was unaware of the plan to exterminate the Jews. He was publicly exposed after his failed bid to sue author Deborah Lipstadt for calling ...
Holocaust denier runs concentration camp toursNew Zealand Herald
Holocaust Denier to Lead Death Camp ToursArutz Sheva

all 3 news articles »

Jewish United Fund

Holocaust scholar Prof. Deborah Lipstadt to keynote Jewish Federation's 115th ...
Jewish United Fund
In 1996, she was sued for libel by one of those named in the book, David Irving, who said his reputation as a historian was defamed. Five years later, a British judge found Irving to be a Holocaust denier, a falsifier of history, a racist, and an anti ...

Highlights

Online Holocaust Denial and Hate Podcast Series:

barbed wireHDOT's new podcast recordings feature interviews with Dr. Saul Friedlander, Father John Pawlikowski and other leading scholars and intellectuals discussing Holocaust denial and online hate speech. Subscribe to the feed in iTunes to receive new podcasts as we post them.

 

 

Further Reading:

XML

Controversy at Harvard: Muslim Chaplain Suggests Death of Muslim Apostates?, May 2, 2009

 

For the past two weeks a controversy has been brewing at Harvard as reported by the Harvard Crimson. Recently it has also been covered in the Forward.

In short, the Muslim chaplain, Abdul-Basser wrote the following to a Muslim student:

great wisdom (hikma) associated with the established and preserved position (capital punishment [for apostates]) and so, even if it makes some uncomfortable in the face of the hegemonic modern human rights discourse, one should not dismiss it out of hand.”
In the Crimson article a number of Muslim students were quoted as being quite critical of his stand. He claims that he has been misinterpreted and was not saying that he supports death for converts from Islam. It's hard how to see otherwise, particular in light of his comment about "hegemonic modern human rights discourse."

He, of course, is free to have any religious view he wishes. It is just disturbing to think that this is the point of view being imparted to students.